Skip to main content

Who needs community-level science-literacy?

By Lea Taragin-Zeller, Yael Rozenblum and Ayelet Baram-Tsabari

I get off the phone with Rabbi Stastky (a pseudonym), and just can’t seem to get back to work. The story he tells me, leaves my mind (and heart) pacing. As part of a study on science communication and religion, I was interviewing Rabbi Statsky, a medical askan (self-ascribed community expert) who serves as an inner-communal mediator for Haredi (strictly Orthodox) men and women during their encounters with Israel’s “secular” medical system. Whereas Haredi Jews are constantly critiqued for their low levels of individual secular and science literacy, these askanim often claim that the knowledge and networks they provide to Haredi individuals surpass that of the average “secular” Israeli. To illustrate this paradox, he shared the following story:

"On an individual level—especially young couples—they have a very low level of knowledge, I would even say too little, really no knowledge. I met a woman who came out of a surgery of a womb amputation but thought it was just a vaginal resection. But on a general level—whoever has a medical problem—because of the abundance of medical organizations, the askanim of our society help people understand. They make the relevant medical information accessible."


Original descriptionr: Family of religious Jews dressed in black walks through the old city of Jerusalem.
Photo by Maayan Nemanov on Unsplash

In our recent publication in Public Understanding of Science, we analyze this phenomenon through the lens of community-level science literacy, which, as defined by Snow and Dibner (2016): “does not require each individual to attain a particular threshold of knowledge, skills, and abilities; rather, it is a matter of a community having sufficient shared resources that are distributed and organized in such a way that the varying abilities of community members work in concert to contribute to the community’s overall well-being”.

While we highly appreciate the efforts of medical askanim like Rabbi Statsky to make medicine more accessible to Haredi Jews in Israel, it is impossible not to wonder: what counts as sufficient community-level science literacy? Is it “sufficient” that a woman has the necessary surgery, yet, has no idea what was actually happening to her own body? In a community with strict verbal taboos around sexuality (see more on this here), is it sufficient that someone in her social network is familiar with the different parts of the reproductive system - or is this something that every individual must know?

Our work is part of a growing interest in community-level science literacy. While most focus on communities of interest who come together through particular science, environmental or health-related goals, we examine a pre-existing community—ultra-Orthodox Jews in Israel— a minority group with a particular history and politics vis-à-vis science, technology, and medicine. Examining Haredi Jews in Israel serves as a unique case study to analyze the particular ways groups construct community-level group literacy based on their pre-existing shared identities and goals. We ask: How do Haredi Jews form intra-communal networks of science literacy? How are webs of community-based experts created and sustained? What types of scientific knowledge do they distribute? And, what can these networks of community-based literacy tell us about how scientific authority is formed (and critiqued) in particular group settings?

Our paper demonstrates how community-based medical experts serve as both science-related knowledge mediators and gatekeepers. Whereas these community-based webs of knowledge claim to position Haredi individuals with knowledge that surpasses the average “secular” Israeli, this case study pushes forward conversations about self-ascribed experts, knowledge gatekeeping, and the socio-political contexts of group critiques of science and their limits. 
Our work also resonates with established qualitative research from sociology, anthropology, STS, and history which have demonstrated how engagement with science is repeatedly shaped by social identity, particular historic contexts and power relations. As Feinstein and Waddington (2020) put it, “People encounter scientific questions in social context—both as members of their social and cultural groups and with other members of those groups.” 

Following these studies, our findings showcase the importance of studying community-level science literacy, in a variety of contexts. It argues that we desperately need to develop a better understanding of what “community” and “sufficient literacy” actually mean. For us, COVID-19 really drove this point home. Not only were there clear community-based decisions to follow or flout public health guidelines, the disproportionate effect of COVID-19 on ethnic and minority groups, painfully showcased who paid the price for this disparity. 

So, who needs community-level science literacy? 

Everyone does, but some people seem to be paying the price for its insufficiency more than others. 



Lea Taragin-Zeller (@leataragin) is assistant professor of Cultural Studies and Public Policy at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. She is also an affiliated researcher at the Reproductive Sociology Research Group (ReproSoc), University of Cambridge. Her research explores the intersections between religion, reproduction, politics, and science and has been published in leading international journals, such as American Anthropologist, Medical Anthropology, and Science CommunicationHer first book “The State of Desire: Religion and Reproductive Politics in the Promised Land” is forthcoming with NYU Press.

Yael Rozenblum (@yael_rozenblum) is a PhD candidate at the Faculty of Education in Science and Technology at the Technion—Israel Institute of Technology. Her PhD research focuses on the development of scientific literacy among the Israeli public and media during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Ayelet Baram-Tsabari (@ayelet_bt) is a professor at the Faculty of Education in Science and Technology at the Technion–Israel Institute of Technology. She was an elected member of the Israel Young Academy and of the scientific committee of the PCST Network and is a PI of the research center on “Taking Citizen Science to School.” Her research focuses on bridging science education and science communication scholarship, and she has published extensively in both disciplines.